Among the theoretical approaches to
motivation listed in the book, I resonate with the cognitive approach to
studying motivation. This approach considers how mental and emotional factors
affect perceptions, which in turn affect student engagement in learning. The
book gives the examples of a learner’s sense of self-determination, locus of
control and self-worth influencing their behavior. Student autonomy is
certainly an important component to consider when constructing activities. For
instance, the book mentions how rules can undermine intrinsic motivation and
make activities feel more like work than play. If activities seem more like
play than work, then students will be more motivated to participate in the
activities. Locus of control refers to whether students interpret outcomes as
controllable or not. For example, if a student believes she did well or poorly
on a test simply because of what the teacher put on the test, her locus of
control is external, and she may not be motivated to study. Self-worth is
considered a basic human need and involves how capable one believes he or she
is. Self-worth is related to other concepts of motivation in the chapter. For
instance, if a student doesn’t believe in himself and thinks he isn’t capable,
then he has a low self-worth and an internal locus of control.
Self-worth
and locus of control are two factors of motivation I consider to be integral to
success in the classroom. As Hsieh et.al put it, students “need to develop a
strong belief that they are capable of completing tasks successfully” (Hsieh
et. al 2007). The teacher project today on self-wroth really made me reflect on
how important one’s sense of capability is to education. My group completed the
easy puzzle too quickly, and, as a result, our self worth was not as high as it
could have been. The groups with the huge puzzles had little chance of
completing the task. Though their long-term self-worth may not have taken a
hit, they felt less motivated when they didn’t believe they could complete the
task. In my future class, I would like to begin the year with a somewhat
similar activity. I would group the students randomly and give them an easy
task (say a 25-piece puzzle) to complete in a given time limit. After that, I
would give the groups a more difficult task (say a 75-piece puzzle) to
complete. After all of the groups completed the more difficult task, I would
have them reflect on the exercise. Then I would tell them that despite their
past experiences, they were all able to collaborate on and complete a task. I
would reveal to them that they have the ability to do well in the class if they
maintain the same attitude all year. Hopefully, this would increase their
self-worth and motivate them to learn in my class.
I like your idea to use the puzzle activity in your future class and I also like how you are (maybe) going to make it different by having them start with a smaller one the work up to a bigger one the get them to compare the two. Our group had a 100 piece puzzle and still couldn't finish. I think my self worth felt fine, but I really wanted to finish and that aggitated me just a little becaus that's just me. I also agree with you when you said that the kids would be more motivated if the works seems more like play than work. And the puzzle thing is a difinite plus that falls under that category. Nice ideas and a creative way to change it up a little, keep it up! :-)
ReplyDeleteDylan, I was also in your group and felt like I could have done a lot more than a 24 piece puzzle. My question is more or less do we think that having that feeling of being able to do more is a bad thing? I felt confident that our group could have done the 100 piece puzzle; was that only because we had accomplished an easy task? I see the importance of a wide variety of skill or checkpoints along the way and am encouraged by any sort of effort to succeed. I guess I'm saying that looking back, I am kind of glad we were done first and with the easy one-it contributed to my self-worth in the long run.
ReplyDeleteNice write up, you hit all the bases. But I probably wouldn't start the school year off with a competency or self-worth type of test with the puzzle game. To me, that would give some students the wrong idea about their ability to complete a task within a certain time, even if all you're doing is assembling a puzzle. It just seems like the ones who received the impossible puzzle would get frustrated and probably question the assignment in the first place. Instead, give the students autonomy in your class. That will motivate them to do well when they have some freedom and choice. I know that my sense of self-worth increases when I am given choices within the parameters of an assignment.
ReplyDelete